Naomi Gan

⭐️⭐️⭐️ Investment Banking Prospect

University of California, Berkeley · Lacrosse · Class of 2028

MAP Prospect Grade

Round 4–5

Watchlist Recommendation

Prospect Info

SchoolUniversity of California, Berkeley
MajorEconomics
MinorN/A
Year2028
GPA3.8
SportLacrosse
HometownPalos Verdes Estates, CA

MAP Profile

Fellowship Rank29 / 78
Interview #192.9%
Interview #296.2%
Interview #389.0%
PersonalityBehind the Scenes (Reserved, Detail-Oriented)
LeadershipDemocratic Leader (Collaborative, Shared Decision-Making)
TeamworkSupportive (Steady, Reliable)

Overview

Naomi is a high-character Behind the Scenes archetype: quieter, diligent, and focused on the quality of her work rather than volume of voice. A 3.8 GPA Economics major at UC Berkeley and former valedictorian with a 1530 SAT, she brings serious academic horsepower paired with a thoughtful, process-driven mindset.

During the Diamond League, Naomi delivered strong assignments and showed real interview ability — thoughtful, structured, concise. Unfortunately, an ACL tear early in lacrosse season forced her to step away from case competition and live MAP phases. Her grade reflects sample size more than ability.

In the reps she did get, Naomi looked like the teammate who quietly keeps operations moving — she listens first, executes carefully, and lets her work speak.

Strengths

Academic excellence — 3.8 GPA, valedictorian, National Merit recognition.
Behind-the-Scenes discipline — focused, diligent, execution-first.
Infrastructure exposure via AECOM internship.
Governance skills from youth board + stakeholder work.
Mental health leadership through Morgan’s Message.
Structured thinker with strong research + analysis skills.
High character + resilience through ACL adversity.

Areas for Development

Limited MAP sample due to injury — fewer data points.
Needs more valuation + modeling reps.
Could express voice more loudly in group settings.
More finance-specific internships recommended.

Projection

A 3-Star, Round 4–5 MAP prospect whose evaluation reflects limited reps more than ability. Naomi displayed strong academics, maturity, and thoughtful interview presence. With more live experience and technical development, she could rise meaningfully and become a quietly effective analyst in future cycles.